Hernia Mesh Lawsuit
Hernia Mesh Overview
Patients who have experienced chronic pain, infection, or the need for revision surgery after being implanted with hernia mesh may be eligible to pursue a claim and seek financial compensation.
Hernia mesh manufacturers are facing hundreds of lawsuits due to a high number of patients experiencing complications from the hernia mesh after undergoing hernia repair surgery. While the purpose of the hernia mesh is to prevent hernia from recurring, many patients have suffered from an increased rate of recurrence and reoperation (with at least one manufacturer acknowledging this to be the case).
If you or a loved one experienced complications associated with hernia mesh after having hernia repair surgery, contact Maxwell Law Group LLP today. We can answer your questions and review your case for free.
What is a Hernia Mesh?
According to the FDA, the majority of hernia mesh is made from synthetic or animal tissue.
In the US, it is estimated that more than 90% of hernia repairs are aided with the use of the hernia mesh since 2000.
Hernia Mesh Quick Facts
How Does a Hernia Mesh Work?
A hernia occurs when an organ or tissue bulges through a weak or open spot in the surrounding tissue or muscle. It most commonly occurs in the abdominal area, specifically in the stomach and intestines.
A hernia mesh is inserted to help reinforce the repair made and prevent
Hernia Mesh Complications
Even with a successful hernia mesh implant surgery, there are instances where the hernia mesh fails, resulting in several complications. According to the FDA, the most common side effects and injuries of hernia mesh include:
- Mesh infection
- Chronic, debilitating pain
- Mesh migration
- Mesh contracture
- Hernia recurrence (as a result of migration and/or contracture)
- Mesh rupture (aka “mechanical failure”)
- Wound dehiscence
- Fistula or sinus tract formation
- Adhesions of mesh to bowel
- Bowel perforation
- Bowel obstruction (as a result of adhesions)
Product Recall Due to Complications
While some hernia mesh implants have proven most effective in patients, there are certain types of hernia mesh that have been linked to serious risks and complications, often leading to revision surgery for some patients. Multiple manufacturers, including C. R. Bard, Atrium Medical, and Ethicon, have issued recalls of their hernia mesh products in recent years.
In 2005, the FDA issued a recall order for the Bard Composix Kugel Mesh Patch, a ventral hernia repair device. It was discovered that the mesh had a potential memory recoil ring breakage from the pressure of placement within the abdomen. Complications included bowel perforation and chronic enteric fistula—which occurs when the device creates holes within the gastrointestinal tract. This prompted Bard to recall over 31,000 mesh units from 2005 to 2007.
Another manufacturer announced a hernia mesh product recall in 2013. Atrium Medical was ordered to recall C-QUR Edge Mesh, stemming from their lack of proper management and response regarding a rising number of complaints about the device. The FDA received reports that the implantation of the hernia mesh resulted in serious infections, causing serious medical conditions like chronic pain and severe allergic reactions.
Ethicon, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, released a field safety notice initiating a product recall of Physiomesh Composite Mesh product line. The hernia mesh originally received a controversial 510(k) clearance from FDA, a type of approval that fast-tracks the application process and release of medical devices to the market, based on the company’s claims that it met all testing criteria. However, within months of its release, many reports of hernia recurrence had been reported.
The company acknowledged the unusually high rates of hernia recurrence and reoperation after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair from various
Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
C.R. Bard. On August 2,
There are also over 2,600 Bard hernia mesh lawsuits pending in Rhode Island state court, the home state of Bard’s subsidiary Davol.
Atrium Medical. Atrium Medical is currently facing over 450 lawsuits from patients who suffered from C-QUR Edge Mesh complications, with thousands still pending in state and federal courts. The lawsuits claim that the company failed to warn the patients about the defective surgical device. They have been centralized into
Ethicon. Ethicon and its parent company Johnson & Johnson are also currently facing hundreds of lawsuits for Physiomesh Flexible Composite Mesh, on the grounds of failure to warn and negligence on releasing a defective product to the market. Cases against Ethicon are being filed in both multicounty
How Maxwell Law Group Can Help
You Deserve to be Compensated
We're On Your Side
Our attorneys are always ready to speak with you about your personal situation. Every day we help people in situations similar to yours. Our team can guide you each step of the way and make sure you get the financial compensation you deserve.
While our physical offices are in Utah and Washington DC, we offer our services nationwide. We'd be honored to discuss your case with you free of charge.
Please note that the law limits the time you have to pursue a claim or file a lawsuit for an injury. If you think you have a case, don't wait to take action. Contact us today.
To speak with us directly, call (844) 525-7155. We want to hear about your situation and help you through this difficult time.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This website is not intended to create, and receipt of viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Sensitive information should not be submitted through this website as it may be considered confidential or privileged. References to prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The firm has attorneys licensed to practice law in Utah and Washington D.C., but the attorneys may also be admitted on an individual basis in additional state and federal courts across the United States. The location of the firm's offices are listed on this website. The firm associates with co-counsel law firms to jointly represent clients in some matters. Gregory Maxwell is the attorney responsible for the contents of this website.